Demystifying Composite Decking
5 common misconceptions about composite material
First introduced in the late 1980s, composite decking quickly gained acceptance among builders and homeowners who recognized and appreciated being able to achieve a natural wood look without the ongoing hassles of upkeep. While most people today understand the main benefits of composite decking ā durability and minimal maintenance ā the material itself is still new enough to raise questions, confusion and some skepticism among homeowners who grew up with wood decks.
To help set the record straight, Trex Company, the worldās No. 1 decking and railing brand and leader in high-performance, low-maintenance outdoor living products, has teamed with backyard design experts Paul Lafrance and Kate Campbell of HGTVās acclaimed āDecked Outā series.
Misconception No. 1: Composite decking looks āfake.ā
āComposite decking has evolved tremendously since its beginnings more than 20 years ago,ā Campbell said. āThe latest generation of products, such as Trex Transcend, look more natural than ever, featuring high-definition wood grain patterns and rich, saturated colors ranging from warm browns and pristine grey to spicy reds. There are also tropically inspired boards designed with subtle color variations and authentic streaking that mimic the look and feel of exotic hardwoods without the environmental impact ā or splinters.ā
Misconception No. 2: All composite decking materials are the same.
āSince composite decking was invented in the early 1990s, the market has been flooded with competitive offerings varying widely in quality, aesthetics and value,ā Lafrance said. āFor my projects, I use what is categorized as āhigh-performanceā composite manufactured with an integrated, three-sided shell or ācap.ā Capped boards feature an added layer of protection against severe weather, heavy foot traffic, fading, mold and staining.ā
Misconception No. 3: Composite decking is maintenance free.
āAnything that sits outside in the elements for years on end is going to need some type of maintenance,ā Campbell said. āWhen it comes to decking, the difference lies in how much upkeep is required. Maintaining wood decking is a downright chore with all the scrubbing, sanding and staining that wood requires ā not to mention the replacement of splintered, warped and rotten boards. High-performance composite decking, on the other hand, calls for just wiping up spills when they happen and a simple soap-and-water cleaning twice a year ā once in the spring when youāre getting it ready for outdoor living season and again when you close up your outdoor living space for the winter.ā
Misconception No. 4: Composite decking is too expensive.
āOver time, wood decking actually ends up being more expensive than composite,ā Lafrance said. āSure, the initial cost of pressure-treated lumber is less than wood alternatives, but since a deck is a long-term investment, itās important to consider the long-term costs, such as all the materials youāll need for seasonal stripping, staining, painting and sealing. Add to that the time and cost involved in repairing and replacing wooden deck boards that will inevitably warp and splinter over time ā even if they are well-maintained. When you factor in the cost of ongoing maintenance required with a wood deck, a composite deck ends up paying for itself in the long run.ā
Misconception No. 5: Composite decking is not eco-friendly.
āBecause it is made primarily from recycled content, composite decking is remarkably eco-friendly,ā Campbell said. āIn fact, Trex composite decking is made from 95 percent recycled content. By using plastic and industrial wood scraps that would otherwise wind up in landfills, they use more than 400 million pounds of recycled material each year in the making of their deck boards.ā
For more information, visit trex.com.
Source:
Trex